History, Schmistory

I loved "The King's Speech". I think does such a great job of showing the indomitable fire of the human spirit. I also love that it is getting recognized by the Academy. But like many historical movies this one takes a few liberties.
Christopher Hitchens (who I usually disagree with it) has an interesting article pointing out how the movie glosses over Edward VIII's Nazi sympathies and George VI's desire for appeasement. He has some valid points, but from his closing remarks it is clear that he has a deep dislike for Great Britain's current ruling family.

"Almost the entire moral capital of this rather odd little German dynasty is invested in the post-fabricated myth of its participation in "Britain's finest hour." In fact, had it been up to them, the finest hour would never have taken place. So this is not a detail but a major desecration of the historical record—now apparently gliding unopposed toward a baptism by Oscar."

At first I thought he was being a bit over zealous in his condemnation of the movie. But I realize that it is a sad fact that for many a movie is their only historical reference point. When a movie grossly exaggerates or changes history this can be an issue. TIME magazine put a list together of the worst offenders.
With this in mind I am going to make a greater effort to use any historical movie as the inspiration for learning more about a subject and NOT the final word.